If you had to summarize in ordinary language the concept of “gender as structure,” what would you say? (How would you explain “gender as a social institution” to a relative or a friend?)
How did Judith Lorber demonstrate the different significance gender categories have for the individual and society? (Hint: It may help to recall Lorber’s discussions of “sameness” and “difference.”)
Your assignment should be a paper 2-3 pages long, not including the required title and reference pages. Adhere to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Include at least three scholarly sources (you may use the recommended readings) to support your answers. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these sources. Remember to use in-text citations as appropriate and to include your sources in your reference page.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
25.0to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment, answering all questions posed.
20.0to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment, answering most questions posed.
15.0to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment, answering some of the questions posed.
10.0to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment, answering few of the questions posed.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
25.0to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of basic sociology research and issues, and applies it correctly to analysis of gender as a social institution. Represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
20.0to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of gender as a social institution.
15.0to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of gender as a social institution.
10.0to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of gender as a social institution.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
25.0to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
20.0to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
15.0to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
10.0to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.
25.0to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error.
20.0to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors.
15.0to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors.
10.0to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.
25.0 pts
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"