BU1006: The Business Environment

/in /by

Coursework Assessment
Submission Date: No later than 12 o’clock (Midday) on 10 th January 2020.
Submit via Turnitin complete with cover sheet containing completed self-assessment
form. Include Action Plan from original feedback where appropriate.
Students are required to answer one of the following questions in the form of a
continuous essay of approximately 2,000 words (+/-10%). The essay should be
written using Harvard Referencing to support your discussion and ideas. You should
use data, graphs and diagrams where appropriate in order to achieve Learning
Outcome 3: Application of analysis tools.
Essay One:
“To ensure a green future the UK cannot rely on free markets alone. The scale of the
climate emergency requires nothing less than full government engagement.”
Partington, R. (7 th July 2019)
Your task is to:
 Explain how the market mechanism operates with regard to the
allocation of resources, and critically analyse the importance of
government engagement concerning climate change.
OR
Essay Two:
“How the state runs business in China. Much of modern China’s epic growth was
driven by private enterprise – but under Xi Jinping, the Communist party has
returned to being the ultimate authority in business as well as politics.” McGregor, R.
(25 th July 2018) The Guardian Long Read.
Your task is to:
 Explain the importance of different political environments in which
businesses operate. Critically analyse these differences, citing
examples of how they might influence business in either positive or
negative ways.
Writing the Essay:
To help you in the task, you are advised to adopt the following guidelines:
Step One = The Information required
 Since you are required to write a continuous 2,000 word
continuous essay using Harvard referencing using a range of
tools of analysis, your first task will be to understand what the
question is asking you to do.
 Once you are satisfied that you understand the question,
formulate an essay plan. You need an introduction, which sets
out your terms of reference. You need to define technical
terms. You need to consider the order in which you are going to
present your discussion. This is an important aspect of essay
writing, as you need to be able to link paragraphs without the
use of bullet points or sub-headers. You will need to provide a
conclusion, which acts as a brief summary of your findings.
Step Two = Collecting, Managing and Using References and Data
 Having established what you are going to do to answer the question, you now
need to collect sufficient data, from text books, journal articles, the Economist
or quality press to use in the essay.
 Identify the lecture and seminar sessions, which cover the topic in the Module
Information Pack. Look at the readings listed as a starting point for your
research.
 Keep a detailed note of the sources you use to obtain your ideas and support
for your answer. Note, you should avoid cutting and pasting material. This
practice is dangerous, as it may lead to the academic offence of plagiarism.
Write the ideas down in your own words. Give a reference to recognise
where the original idea, or the support for your argument came from. E.g:
Sloman (2017) suggested that there is a relationship between free markets
and poor social cohesion. Whilst you are only paraphrasing the many lines of
text used to convey the argument in the original text, you are showing that you
have understood the idea, and have acknowledged that it originally came from
Sloman and not from you.
 Try to avoid using direct quotes. They should be used very sparingly for
emphasis only. There is very little value added in a string of quotes. If you
must use direct quotes, you must use quotation marks and provide additional
details of the page on which the quote appears.
 Try to identify relevant graphs, data or other tools of analysis to supplement
your answer. When using such diagrams, remember to use your own
numbering system. The first diagram you use will be Figure 1 – even if it is
Figure 7 in your source material!
Such a diagram should be fully labelled, titled and the source provided. This
source, along with all other references used should be included in the
bibliography at the end of the essay.
Step Three = Writing up
 Having established your essay plan, collected sufficient data and ideas with
references to support them, you can now write the essay.
 When you have finished writing the essay, read through it once again and ask
yourself:
 Does it have an introduction, which sets out the terms of reference?
 Does it address all the relevant issues?
 Are the ideas attributed to the original author using Harvard Referencing?
 Does the essay flow seamlessly from one paragraph to the next?
 Are there diagrams and/or data or other forms of analysis to support my
findings?
 Is there a conclusion, which briefly summarises your main findings?
 Have I cross- referenced all items in a bibliography, presented in alphabetical
order by author surname?
 Are full author/publisher details provided in the bibliography?
Step Four = Self-assessment
 Below is a list of the Assessment criteria. These will be applied to this essay.
 A traffic light system is used. Red suggests danger – work is needed to reach
the appropriate standard. Amber represents an acceptable level of
performance. Green represents a good level of performance.
 Rows in the first column show the assessment criteria and its weighting for
this assessment. Thus Presentation/Structure/Referencing (25%) indicates
that evidence of a well organised and presented piece of work is supported by
correct refrencing is one of the criteria and it contributes to 25% of your total
mark for this essay.
 Columns 2 to 4 are used to describe the corresponding Red, Amber and
Green outcomes. Thus column 2 suggests that Red is awarded for “wrongly
formatted /or badly structured work with insufficient levels of reference”.
Column 3 suggests that Amber is awarded for “work with a reasonable
structure, in the correct format which is generally well referenced, with some
exceptions”. Column 4 shows that Green represents a “well- structured and
organised piece of work supported fully by strong referencing.
 A similar type of interpretation applies to the other three categories:
Research/Evidence/Interpretation; Knowledge and Understanding; and
Argument/Evaluation and Application.
You should refer to the marking criteria at all stages:

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

BSM930 Module Name: Entrepreneurial Strategies

/in /by

Corporate entrepreneurship was defied in the module as, “…the
process whereby an individual or a group of individuals in association with an
existing organization, create a new organization or instigate renewal or innovation
with the organization (Sharma and Chrisman, 1999)”.
a) Debate the benefits of pursuing corporate entrepreneurship
b) Highlight the common issues faced by organisations in trying to do so.
(1500 words +/-10%)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

BSM930 Module Name: Entrepreneurial Strategies

/in /by

Discuss the concepts of causation and effectuation in the
entrepreneurial process.
In answering you should;
a) Outline your understanding of each concept in turn.
b) Debate them in the context of starting a new venture.
c) Conclude with a position supported form your discussion.
d) Make reference wherever relevant to module learnings and wider reading
(1500 words +/-10%)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

BSM930 Module Name: Entrepreneurial Strategies

/in /by

To what extent do you agree with the following statement?
‘Entrepreneurship is about creating new, profitable businesses to enhance wealth’. In
answering you should;
a) Consider all of the issues that are raised in the statement.
b) Conclude with a position supported from your discussion.
c) Make reference wherever relevant to module learnings and wider reading.
(1500 words +/- 10%)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

BSM930 Module Name: Entrepreneurial Strategies

/in /by

Coursework Title:
Assignment 001: Coursework
Task Details/Description:
This is an individual piece of assessment. Students are required to complete 2 out of 3
short answer questions.
Students will justify positions taken through strong argumentation, synthesis of knowledge
and research work, and adequate citation support. In addition, the assignment requires
students to use tools and frameworks discussed in class.
The purpose of this assignment is to apply core concepts discussed in class and thereby
increase knowledge & understanding. To do well in the assignment students also have to
demonstrate core entrepreneurial skills such as creativity and logical thinking.
Question 1: To what extent do you agree with the following statement?
‘Entrepreneurship is about creating new, profitable businesses to enhance wealth’. In
answering you should;
a) Consider all of the issues that are raised in the statement.
b) Conclude with a position supported from your discussion.
c) Make reference wherever relevant to module learnings and wider reading.
(1500 words +/- 10%)
Question 2: Discuss the concepts of causation and effectuation in the
entrepreneurial process.
In answering you should;
a) Outline your understanding of each concept in turn.
b) Debate them in the context of starting a new venture.
c) Conclude with a position supported form your discussion.
d) Make reference wherever relevant to module learnings and wider reading
(1500 words +/- 10%)
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT
Question 3: Corporate entrepreneurship was defied in the module as, “…the
process whereby an individual or a group of individuals in association with an
existing organization, create a new organization or instigate renewal or innovation
with the organization (Sharma and Chrisman, 1999)”.
a) Debate the benefits of pursuing corporate entrepreneurship
b) Highlight the common issues faced by organisations in trying to do so.
In answering you should make reference wherever relevant to module learnings and wider
reading.
Module Learning Outcomes Assessed:
1. Critique entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial skills in different entrepreneurial contexts
2. Reflect on their entrepreneurial skills in order to analyse and draw relevant inferences
from empirical case studies of entrepreneurship.
Presentation Requirements:
Word Count: 3000 words (1500 x 2)
Font Size: Arial 12
Line Spacing: Double
Submission Date & Time:
Date (12:00 noon UK time)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

SIM335 Managing Projects

/in /by

This is an individual assignment – complete both tasks 1 and 2
Background: The assignment is intended to bring out the benefits and limitations of the four
stages of Project life cycle with different approaches to project planning and control by relating
these to the circumstances in the cases outlined. It is also intended to allow students to
demonstrate their learning and competence in respect of the management of resources generally
but in particular elements of scope, schedule, quality, and cost.
Task 1 (40% marks) 600 words (+/- 10%)
Q1. What are the core principles/characteristics of any project and why are they important?
(8 marks).
Q2. How would you have defined the scope of the project in Task 2; case study (Concrete
Masonry Corporation) (6 marks).
Q3. Using the information below, plot out a full project Network diagram and identify the
critical path? (2 marks)
How many days does it take to complete the project? (2 marks)
What are the benefits of using a Gantt chart? (2 marks). (Total 2×3=6 marks)
Q4. Define one of the following cost appraisal methods; NPV, Payback or IRR. What are the
benefits of your chosen method? (4 marks).
Q5. How would you have assessed and managed the risks on the project in Task 2; case study
(Concrete Masonry Corporation) (6 marks).
Q6 Outline and explain the purpose of Quality audits. Identify the reasons why such methods
(Project evaluation, Monitoring and Control) would you introduce to ensure this Task 2;
project (Concrete Masonry Corporation) is completed successfully (10 marks).
2
Tasks Precedence Time
a – 3 days
b a 6 days
c b 3 days
d b 4 days
e c 5 days
f c 4 days
g d 6 days
h f 3 days
j h 4 days
Task 2: (60% marks)
The Concrete Masonry Corporation designs and manufactures pre-stressed concrete for the
building Industry for years; the company enjoyed a stable marketplace and a relatively
predictable business environment. Although there had been a boom in residential construction in
recent years, commercial work was on the decline. As a result, all the pre-stressed concrete
manufacturers were going further afield to big jobs. In order to survive, Concrete Masonry
Corporation was forced to bid on jobs previously thought to be out of their geographical area.
Survival depended upon staying competitive. However with the declining conditions of the
market and the evolution that had drastically changed the character of the market place, the
Concrete Masonry Corporation previously successful approach was now in question.
With the removal of trade barriers and other Globalized international trade agreements, the
Concrete Masonry Corporation found itself competing with other pre-stressed manufacturers
headquartered in countries around the world. A decision was then made to transfer several
manufacturing machines to a new site in Eastern Europe to allow more agility and efficiency
within their manufacturing supply.
The Project
The project was to include the transfer of 8 pre-stressed concrete assembly machines, along with
ancillary equipment into Eastern Europe. Scheduling the project had to take 6 months from
September before production must start to supply potential customers. A site had been selected
although the appointed Project Manager and potential team members had not visited the area,
nor did they understand the weather conditions of wind, rain and snow that prevailed in this area.
The assembly machines were to be transported by sea and then road haulage before arriving at
the new site. Road infrastructure was again an area that required attention.
Kevin Lewis
Kevin Lewis has been appointed as the Project manager for this installation transfer. He is a
29-year-old graduate of a well known University in the UK with a B.S.degree in Mechanical
Engineering. After graduation, he worked for five years in Engineering Design Industries. Although
3
he took a significant pay cut, he jumped at the opportunity to return to his home location with
Concrete Masonry Corporation. His job in Engineering Industries had been very demanding. The
long hours and extensive travelling had created tension in his marriage. He was looking forward to
a normal job with reasonable hours, or so he thought. While working in Engineering Design
Industries, Lewis worked on projects and installed new Engineering designs. He was confident that
he had the requisite technical expertise to excel at his new job with the Concrete Masonry
Corporation.
The Team
Lewis had a part-time team of five assistants on placement from the departments within Concrete
Masonry Corporation. At first, he was not sure how freely he could delegate work to the assistants
bearing in mind they also reported to other managers within the organisation. He quickly realised
that they were all very bright, competent workers who were anxious to leverage this project
experience into a lucrative career.
The project transfer has an investment of £900,000 pounds and is scheduled to take 6 months to
complete; taking into account, the project would be completed during the winter which would be
difficult. Lewis and his team would first need to visit the new location and start to consider the
project activities.
You are required to prepare a report concerning the main issues to be addressed by Kevin Lewis
from a project management perspective (2,500 words +/- 10%).
From a project management perspective base on Project life cycle outline the activities required
to be completed by Kevin Lewis to successfully implement this new initiative, e.g. Project Scope
Statement, Project Priorities (with a balanced trade-off and justification), Work Breakdown
Structure (with brief details of work packages) and Cost Estimation (with time-phased budget)
ensuring that it can operate on-time, and within budget. Kevin Lewis is only Project Managing the
transfer of equipment and not the actual facility building project. (Assume the building has
already been completed.)
Your report should be based on the four stages of Project life cycle and include examples of the
concerns, Project Life cycle stages, associated with managing the lifecycle of this major project.
Don’t forget to provide Network diagram, Gantt chart, cost appraisal methods and any other
relevant table or information as an Appendix; also any practical examples in relation to relevant
theories in Task 2 should be derived from the case study.
Assignment presentation and assessment
The answers to both tasks are independent and should be addressed separately.
Task 1 answers to six questions – (600 words) – completed as an individual task
Task 2 a report that is produced for Task two (2500 words) – completed as an individual task
For your convenience, both tasks should be submitted as one document, which contains both
individual tasks.
The criteria for assessing the task two report will be:
4
Report presentation (20%) (12 marks)
The extent to which the assignment represents a valid report. This will be judged on:
Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount?
Is the text double spaced?
Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear
introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop
ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices?
Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelt correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear?
Referencing: Have appropriate references been included in the report. Has a recognised
referencing system been used for notation? (see the relevant section in the Guide to Basic Study
Skills)
Use of relevant theory (40%)(24 marks)
Has the right theoretical content been chosen as the basis for answering the questions? Is there
evidence of the use of course notes and books? Is the theory that is selected significant to the
questions?
Analysis (40%) (24 marks)
This measures the extent to which students develop a structured argument for the points they
make by combining relevant theory with the information provided in the questions.
Any work submitted is subject to the University's rules and procedures governing infringement
of assessment regulations.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Contemporary Developments in Business and Management (SIM337)

/in /by

Contemporary Developments in Business and Management(SIM337)
Assessment weighted at 100% assessing all module learning outcomes (Task1 – 30% & Task2 – 70%).
Activity:
Prepare a management report of 3,500 to 4,000 words* on an organization** within one of the
followingindustry/sectors***:
1. Agriculture, forestry and fishing (Section A)
2. Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding (Section K, Division 65)
 Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security
3. Human health and social work activities (Section Q)
4. Arts, entertainment and recreation (Section R, Divisions 90, 91 & 92)
 Creative, arts and entertainment activities
 Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities
 Gambling and betting activities
[An organization profile must be included in your submission as “Appendix1”.]
This report should assess the impact of external business environmental factors on the organization
and evaluate the organization’s position and responses. In the case of a large organization it is
permissible to confine your report to part of the organization. An organization’s activities may range
beyond the designated industrial sector in which case the focus of your report must be on the
organization’s activities within the designatedsector.
* You are advised to write between 3.500 and 4,000 words and the word limit is 4,000 words. This
word limit does not include the title page, the executive summary, the contents page, the
organization profile, tables, diagrams, appendices or references. You must include an accurate a
word count on your title page.
(See the following link https://docushare.sunderland.ac.uk/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-8851/AQH-
F14%20Policy%20on%20penalties%20for%20exceeding%20the%20prescribed%20limit%20for%20an%20assignment.pdf
for guidance)
** If you wish to select a firm from outside the identified industries/ sectors, you are required to
seek approval from your module tutor (your lecturer). A note from your lecturer confirming her/ his
approvalshould be uploaded to JIRA. This is your (student)responsibility.
*** According to the “International Standard Industrial Classification of All EconomicActivities”
https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesm/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf
Task 1 (30%weighting)
Give a brief overview of the primary external influences to which the organization is subject and
briefly explain the particular importance of each to theorganization.
This first task should contribute no more than one third of your overallreport.
Task 2 (70%weighting)
Choose one of the following themes:
1. Ethics and Corporate SocialResponsibility
2. Regional geopolitics
3. Climate change
4. Changing demography
5. Migration
In relation to your chosen theme:
i. analyse its relevance to your chosen organization and how it influences policies and
decision-making within your chosen organization orindustry-sector.
ii. critically evaluate the effectiveness of the organization’sresponse.
iii. (if possible and appropriate) demonstrate some areas for improvement in the response of
the organization. If you consider it not possible and appropriate to suggest areas for
improvement, justify yourposition.
Guidance notes:
Whatever organization you choose and whichever theme you chose, you must clearly demonstrate
knowledge and understanding from research and reading wider than that contained in the module
pack and core textbook. This is a REPORT and so must be presented in business report format and
style. You must also structure your report to cover the tasks including points 2.i to 2.iii above. This is
an academic piece of work therefore you are expected to link theory and practice. You should take
care to ensure that the work you submit has a high standard of presentation. This is an individual
assignment. You must acknowledge your sources of information and evidence using the Harvard
referencing system. All assignments are subject to the University’s regulations on collusion and
plagiarism and must be submitted in electronic form for checking on SunSpace for Turnitin and the
Turnitin report must be submitted to JIRA along with yourassignment.
Summary AssessmentCriteria
1. Relevance: Directly relevant to the requirements of the assessment.(10%)
2. Knowledge: A substantial knowledge of relevant material, showing a clear grasp of themes,
questions and issues therein.(20%)
3. Analysis: Good analysis, clear and orderly(20%)
4. Argument and structure: Coherent and logically structured, using an appropriate mode of
argument and/or theoretical model(s).(20%)
5. Critical evaluation: Contains distinctive or independent thinking; may formulate an
independent position in relation to theory and/or practice.(10%)
6. Presentation: Well written, with standard spelling and grammar, in a readable style with an
acceptable format. (10%)
7. Reference to literature: Critical appraisal of up-to-date and/or appropriate literature.
Recognition of different perspectives. Good use of a range of sources.
(10%)
(See marking scheme below for more detailedguidance)
SIM337 Marking Scheme and Generic Assessment Criteria
These will be interpreted according to the assignment tasks and the module assessment criteria.
Grade Relevance (10%) Knowledge
(20%)
Analysis (20%) Argument and
Structure (20%)
Critical
Evaluation (10%)
Presentation
(10%)
Reference to
Literature (10%)
Pa
ss 86 –
100%
The work examined is exemplary and provides clear evidence of a complete grasp of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate
to SIM337. There is also unequivocal evidence showing that all the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been fully satisfied. At this level it is
expected that the work will be exemplary in all the categories cited above. It will demonstrate a particularly compelling evaluation,
originality, and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse.
76-
85%
The work examined is excellent and demonstrates comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriateto SIM337. There is
also excellent evidence showing that all the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been fully satisfied. At this level it is expected that the work
will be excellent in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly compelling evaluation and elegance of
argument, interpretation or discourse.
70 –
75%
The work examined is of a high standard and there is evidence of comprehensive knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to
SIM337. There is clearly articulated evidence demonstrating that all the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been satisfied At this level it is
expected that the standard of the work will be high in the majority of the categories cited above or by demonstrating particularly
compelling evaluation and elegance of argument, interpretation or discourse.
60 –
69%
Directly
relevant to the
requirements of
the assessment
(6 – 7)
A substantial
knowledge of
relevant
material,
showing a clear
grasp of themes,
questions and
issues therein.
(12 – 14)
Good analysis,
clear and
orderly
(12 – 14)
Generally coherent
and logically
structured, using an
appropriate mode of
argument and/or
theoretical model(s)
(12 – 14)
(May) contain
some distinctive or
independent
thinking; (may)
begin to formulate
an independent
position in relation
to theory and/or
practice. (6 – 7)
Well written, with
standard spelling
and grammar, in a
readable style
with acceptable
format
(6 – 7)
Critical appraisal of
up-to-date and/or
appropriate literature.
Recognition of
different
perspectives. Very
good use of source
material. Uses a
range of sources. (6
– 7)
50 –
59%
Some attempt to
address the
requirements of
the assessment:
(may drift away
from this in less
focused
passages)
(5 – 6)
Adequate
knowledge of a
fair range of
relevant
material, with
intermittent
evidence of an
appreciation of
its significance.
(10 – 12)
Some
analytical
treatment, but
(may be) prone
to description,
or to narrative,
which lacks
clear analytical
purpose. (10 –
12)
Some attempt to
construct a coherent
argument, but (may)
lose focus and
consistency, with
issues at stake
stated only vaguely,
or theoretical
model(s) couched in
simplistic terms. (10
– 12)
Sound work which
expresses a
coherent position
and evaluation
only in broad
terms and in
uncritical
conformity to one
or more standard
views of the topic.
(5 – 6)
Competently
written, with
only minor
lapses from
standard
grammar, with
acceptable
format
(5 – 6)
Uses a variety of
literature which
includes some recent
texts and/or
appropriate literature,
though not necessarily
including a
substantive amount
beyond library texts.
Competent use of
source material. (5 –
6)
40 –
49%
Some correlation
with the
requirements of
the assessment
but there are
instances of
irrelevance.
(4 – 5)
Basic
understanding
of the subject
but addressing a
limited range of
material
(8 – 10)
Largely
descriptive or
narrative, with
little evidence
of analysis
(8 – 10)
A basic argument is
evident, but mainly
supported by
assertion and (there
may be) a lack of
clarity and coherence
(8 – 10)
Some evidence of
a view and a very
basic evaluation
starting to be
formed but mainly
derivative. (4 – 5)
A simple basic
style but with
significant
deficiencies in
expression or
format that
(may) pose
obstacles for the
reader. (4 – 5)
Some up-to-date
and/or appropriate
literature used.
Goes beyond the
material tutor has
provided/main text.
Limited use of
sources to support a
point. (4 – 5)
Fa
il 35 –
39%
Relevance to the
requirements of
the assessment
(may be) very
intermittent,
and/or (may be)
reduced to its
vaguest and least
challenging
terms. (3.5 – 4)
A limited
understanding
of a narrow
range
of material
(7 – 8)
Heavy
dependence on
description,
and/or on
paraphrase
(7 – 8)
Little evidence of
coherent argument:
acks development and
(may be) repetitive
or thin
(7 – 8)
Almost wholly
derivative: the
writer’s
contribution rarely
goes beyond
simplifying
paraphrase
(3.5 – 4)
Numerous
deficiencies in
expression and
presentation; the
writer (may)
achieve clarity (if
at all) only by
using a
simplistic or
repetitious style.
(3.5 – 4)
Barely adequate use
of literature. Over
reliance on material
provided by the
tutor/main text.
(3.5 – 4)
The evidence provided shows that the majority of the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been satisfied – For Compensation consideration
30 –
34%
The work examined provides insufficient evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to SIM337. The evidence
provided shows that some of the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been satisfied.
15-
29%
The work examined is unacceptable and provides little evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to SIM337. The
evidence provided shows that few of the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been satisfied.
0-14% The work examined is unacceptable and provides almost no evidence of the knowledge, understanding and skills appropriate to SIM337.
The evidence provided fails to show that any of the learning outcomes of SIM337 have been satisfied.
Please note that all work must to be referenced correctly according to the Harvard system. Marks will be subtracted for poor referencing and more serious cases of
plagiarism or collusion will be reported to the University of Sunderland Faculty of Business and Law Infringement Panel.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

BFM234 Module Name: Accounting for non-financial managers

/in /by

Coursework Title:
Individual essay assignment
Task Details/Description:
The objective of general purpose financial reporting is to provide financial
information about the reporting entity that is useful to present and potential
equity investors, lenders and other creditors in making decisions about
providing resources to the entity.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) Conceptual Framework
Requirement
Drawing on the material covered in the module, and other appropriate accounting
research literature, critically evaluate the above assertion from the IASB.
Guidance
The term “critically evaluate” has the following meaning:
Give your verdict as to what extent you agree with an assertion. Provide evidence
taken from a range of sources which both agree with and contradict the statement.
Come to a final conclusion, basing your decision on what you judge to be the most
important factors and justify how you have made your choice.
Module Learning Outcomes Assessed:
1. Assess the implications of accounts for management decision-making and/or strategy
formulation
2. Evaluate theories concerning the role(s) played by accounting in organisations and
society
COURSEWORK ASSIGNMENT
Presentation Requirements:
Word Count: 1500
Font Size: 11
Line Spacing: Double spacing

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Foreign Policy Analysis

/in /by

ASSESSMENT
Assessment will comprise two strands, formative (non-assessed) and summative (assessed).
The formative component comprises an opportunity to receive feedback by submitting an essay outline (no more than 1,000 words). Students are encouraged to provide short outlines for one of the two essays. Plans should be no more than two sides of A4 in 12 point Times New Roman (or similar), and emailed to the lecturer at least ten days prior to the essay submission deadline. Outlines that meet these criteria will be read and returned with comments. Draft essays will not be read.
The final mark for the course is unaffected by submission of essay outlines. It is, however, a valuable opportunity to receive feedback on your work, which may assist you in writing the essays.
The summative assessment comprises two essays of 2500 words each. Each essay is worth 50% of the final grade.
The first essay is due the Monday of Week 6, 17 February. It will consist of a critical evaluation of the recommended readings for one week of the student’s choosing from Weeks 1-5. Students must not merely summarize the readings, but must discuss and analyse their contrasting arguments in light of each other and assess the evidence each reading offers. This critical assessment must cover at least Five of the recommended readings for one week.
The essay can address the following questions:
What are the main arguments and/or main findings of the readings?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each argument?
What kinds of assumptions underpin these arguments? What is taken for granted or unspoken that the authors accept unproblematically?
What kind of evidence do the authors present? Is it persuasive? Why or why not?
Does the evidence presented support the argument?
Is there another way to interpret the evidence that differs from the author’s interpretation?
Are there other kinds of evidence that would better supplement the argument?
Are there any policy implications of the argument?
This is not meant to be an exhaustive inventory of issues that the essay should address, but it should get you started. In terms of organization, the essay should have a brief introductory paragraph (a “road map” of the essay telling the reader, in broad terms, what s/he is about to read) and a brief concluding paragraph.
The second essay is due on 27 April. It must address one of the essay questions listed below. The essay may draw upon the required readings, but importantly MUST also draw from at least five of the suggested/recommended readings.
ESSAY QUESTIONS FOR ASSESSMENT II
1. “Explanations of foreign policy must focus on the role of psychology in decision-making.” Discuss.
2. How does a focus on race and/or gender politics challenge more conventional approaches to foreign policy analysis?
3. Compared with other factors, does public opinion have a significant influence on foreign policy decisions?
4. What potential advantages and/or disadvantages do the concepts of “discourse” and “identity”
offer to the study of foreign policy?
5. Is it possible to conduct an ethical foreign policy?
Guide to Essay Marking
Grade Mark Description
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5 22
21
20
19
18 Excellent performance is characterised by most but necessarily all of the following:
Clear, comprehensive answer that displays sound critical thinking and insights
Relevant evidence and readings from the course, and perhaps beyond, are cited accurately with very few errors.
All key points are addressed fully
Originality, creativity, and independent judgement are present
B1
B2
B3 17
16
15 Very good performance is characterised by most but not necessarily all of the following:
Clear answer that fully addresses the key points
Sound reasoning that displays a good understanding of the subject matter
Relevant evidence and course readings are used with few errors
Less critical thinking, originality, and insight than in an excellent performance
C1
C2
C3 14
13
12 Good performance is characterised by most but not necessarily all of the following:
Answer displays a basic understanding of the subject matter
Evidence of reading from course materials, but some points may not be fully relevant
Little in the way of an argument or critical thinking
Some errors may be present
D1
D2
D3 11
10
9 Satisfactory performance is characterised by most but not necessarily all of the following:
Only a modest understanding of the subject matter is displayed
Modest evidence of reading from course materials, with the inclusion of a few relevant points
Many errors may be present
E1
E2
E3 8
7
6 Weak performance is characterised by most but not necessarily all of the following:
Failure to answer question, though there may be an answer to a similar question
Little evidence of any understanding of the subject matter is displayed
Significant errors may be present
F1
F2
F3 5
4
3 Poor performance is characterised by most but not necessarily all of the following:
Failure to answer question directly
Very little evidence of any understanding of the subject matter is displayed
Many significant errors are likely to be present
G1
G2 2
1 Very poor performance is characterised by most of the following:
Failure to answer question
No evidence of any understanding of the subject matter is displayed
H 0 Absence of positive qualities
Good essays should show consistency of standpoint or argument together with acknowledgement of rival arguments, clear structure, simple and direct writing, good punctuation and evidence of wide reading. Choose a question from those listed below.
Please read the criteria for written assessment (below). The MSc/MRes in IR Course Guide and the School’s PGT Student Handbook should be consulted for further information about submission of assessed work, Urkund, marking conventions, penalties, extensions and other matters.
Exchange or disability students might have special assessment arrangements. Please contact the lecturer.
Word Limits
Word limits for all assessed work in Politics include footnotes/endnotes but not bibliography (appendices, where applicable, are also excluded). Students should clearly state the word count on the cover sheet of their assessed work.
Students who submit an essay which is over the word limit will be penalised: 1 point in the 22 scale for being over/under the word limit by 10-15 per cent, 2 points for 15-20 per cent, and 3 points for 20-25 per cent, 4 points for 30-25 per cent, etc.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

LLP304 Module Title: Sustainability and Leadership in Sport Organisations

/in /by

Assignment
Based on a review of the leadership literature it could be argued that sustainability
leadership – or more precisely, leadership for sustainability – is not a separate school of
leadership thought, but a particular blend of leadership characteristics applied within a
definitive context. The Cambridge University Sustainability Leadership Institute offers a
definition of sustainability leaders suggesting they are individuals who are compelled to
make a difference by deepening their awareness of themselves in relation to the world
around them. In doing so, they adopt new ways of seeing, thinking and interacting that
result in innovative sustainable solutions. This would suggest that sustainability leadership is
implicitly about creating change.
You must prepare a 2000 word essay. This is a strict word count (no overage allowed). Using
the above commentary as a starting point, identify a prominent sport figure and critically
analyse if they can be considered a sustainability leader. This should be done using
numerous academic and industry references to appropriately justify your positions
throughout the document. Your selection of sport person to analyse should be cleared with
the module tutor for this assessment.
Learning Outcomes Assessed:
Knowledge and Understanding:
• The aetiology of sustainability and be able to debate the application of sustainable
leadership practices
Subject-specific skills:
• Evaluate the application of sustainable principles to specific areas within a specific
context such as sport
Key/transferable skills
• Critically evaluate methods and results obtained in published literature
• Plan and implement sustainable answers to problems in the sport workplace
Assessment Criteria:
A. KNOWLEDGE and UNDERSTANDING
1. Evidence that a wide range of relevant high quality literature has been accessed, e.g.
• Original research work accessed whenever possible.
• Contemporary – with exception of seminal work.
• Claims are substantiated.
• Literature/reference material is appropriate and clearly linked to the assignment topic.
2. Key concepts are presented to demonstrate understanding of the key issues, e.g.
• Aims of the assignment are clearly stated.
B. ANALYSIS and EVALUATION
1. Evidence of critical analysis e.g.
• Identifying and challenging assumptions.
• An awareness of the importance of context in creating meaning.
2. Critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of cited research/literature
3. Credible conclusions are made.
C. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE
1. Credible links between theory and practice are demonstrated, e.g.
• Realistic recommendations are suggested.
• Ethical issues
2. Evidence is evaluated and applied to practice.
D. PRESENTATION and COMMUNICATION
1. The assessment guidelines have been interpreted and followed.
2. Coherent and logical structure.
3. Correctly and consistently formatted references and citations (i.e. Harvard style).
4. Writing is articulate, e.g.
• Appropriate use of technical language.
• Correct spelling, grammar and syntax.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"