Students will create a Disaster Recovery Plan for either the organization they work for or one they wish to work for in the future. The plan will follow the template/example provided.
Student should request prior authorization of company to be addressed to ensure that all students are working on unique companies.
Assignment = 200 points
**Even though this is a technical document, for academic purposes, all sources should be cited and referenced.
***Student may modify some of the sections per the company they have selected but all students will need to complete a DR Plan for the Portfolio Requirement.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 05:16:082021-08-01 05:16:08create a disaster recovery plan for either the organization they work for or one they wish to work for in the future 1
You are invited to reflect on the nature of art and its fundamental principles. Two types of art are offered for a debate: Representation versus Abstraction; and the idea of context is presented (the time and place in which the artwork was created). For a complete understanding of these terms and how to apply them, you should also read Chapter 1 of your textbook: The Nature of Art and Creativity.
Watch two video-talks:
Go to Discussions in the course menu area, locate Module 1 – Discussion Assignment 2: Representation versus Abstraction, and Context in the Art forum, write a three (3) paragraph minimum essay identifying which type of art (representational or abstract) is more appealing to you and why. In your opinion, what major quality constitutes Art? How important is the context in appreciating and understanding an artwork?
Listen attentively to the experts in the videos and learn from their informed discussion on how to analyze and critique a work of art. Build your text on the points they bring up in their talk and share your own take on the subject. Feel free to agree or disagree with them and your classmates but base your case on valid points and arguments.
Use these two works as examples in your essay to support your opinions and ideas about representation, abstraction, and context in art.
Reply to at least two of your classmates. Your initial posting should be a minimum three (3) paragraphs in length, while your responses should be at least one (1) paragraph.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:59:142021-08-01 04:59:14you are invited to reflect on the nature of art and its fundamental principles two types of art are offered for a debate representation versus abstraction and the idea of context is presented the time and place in which the artwork was created fo
My topic is disorders of the veins.. This is a research paper. I really need a good grade on this paper I am finishing my core classes for nursing school
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:54:102021-08-01 04:54:10disorders of the veins
Compose a post that integrates a complete Bible scripture verse and transcends all aspects of the following question(s) comprehensively and collectively as a single post.
-200-300 Words
What are the advantages and disadvantages associated with corporations operating in centralized or decentralized fashions? Elaborate upon these factors.
What factors should a firm’s managers consider when determining the degree of international involvement appropriate for the organization? Explain.
Supporting your argument (intext citing shows this)
When all is done, give a brief conclusion
a reference at the end
Strategic Management: Theory and Practice, 5th Edition, (Solon, OH: Academic Media Solutions, 2017) John A. Parnell (Online eTextbook Access Card: ISBN 978-1-942-04128-3)
Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap–and Others Don’t, 1st Edition, (New York, NY: Harper Business, 2001) James Collins (ISBN-13: 978-0066620992)
Read: Parnell Chapter 6
Collins Chapter 4
View Videos = Copy/Paste the URL unto your browser:
The queue to the first McDonald’s in Moscow in 1990 is documented, which makes a simple yet profound point about the popularity of the golden arches in non-U.S. markets. However, the second video demonstrates how even strong global businesses are subject to political considerations.
As noted by Janssen, Wimmer and Deljoo (2015), the technological debate centers around technology and humans, technology and society, and technology itself. The question is: Who drives technology?
Are humans the drivers of technology or does technology drive humans?
Does technology possess any values of its own and are these values given to technology by humans or does technology have no values whatsoever and is it completely neutral?
What is the relationship between technology and society, does technology constitute society or is it the other way around?
Elaborate on each of the drivers of technology. Make sure to include your opinion for each driver.
Your research paper should be at least 3 pages (800 words), double-spaced, have at least 4 APA references, and typed in an easy-to-read font in MS Word (other word processors are fine to use but save it in MS Word format). Your cover page should contain the following: Title, Student’s name, University’s name, Course name, Course number, Professor’s name, and Date.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:43:422021-08-01 04:43:42paper on technological perceptions the debate
Reflect on what you observed in the video as you answer the following:
Based on what you observed, what leadership skills should you, as Masaya’s preceptor, model for your fellow coworkers to promote his acceptance into the work-group or team.
Does incivility seem to be an issue in the scenario?
Describe any common themes you discovered among the article, the video and the Civility Index
Do you think delegation played a part in this issue.
Grading
To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:43:202021-08-01 04:43:20develop a personal awareness of complex organizational systems and integrate values and beliefs with organizational mission
In the classic novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus Finch says to his daughter Scout: “If you can learn a simple trick, Scout, you’ll get along a lot better with all kinds of folks. You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view – until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.â€1
Reference:
Empathy: The Misunderstood Skill
When a person becomes defensive, we need a tactic or skill to diffuse the emotional response and translate the conversation to a problem-solving focus. This skill is empathy.
Empathy is recognizing and labeling another person’s feelings and thoughts.
This technique allows you to focus on facts, not on personality. Emotions are vented and dealt with so a discussion can continue constructively.
Empathy is not agreement; it is a reflective technique to encourage open communication. The person witnesses you listening to him or her and will perceive you are trying to respond to his or her issues.
The Differences Between Sympathy, Empathy, and Apathy
Sympathy: sameness of feeling; a feeling of approval of, or agreement with, an idea. “You poor thing, I know just how you feel, I had my report rejected, too.â€
Empathy: the ability to share in another’s emotion, thoughts, or feelings. “I see that you are concerned that the interview didn’t go well.â€
Apathy: lack of emotion or interest; unconcern or indifference. “It is ridiculous to get so upset over this.â€
The Three-Step Process of Using Empathy to Influence Behavior
Label the emotion – You seem annoyed about…
Restate the content – You seem annoyed about your efforts going unnoticed.
Create a transition sentence – You seem annoyed about your efforts going unnoticed. What steps can you take to publicize your work?
Answer Part I – Use the following scenario to practice the three-step approach to empathy. Read the scenario, assume you are the team leader, and write an empathetic response using the three-step process.
Scenario
“Why are you giving me such a hard time about being five minutes late for our team meeting? Give me a break! You know that I have responsibilities at home, and it is hard for me to get here on time. I’m 40, and I have a wife and two small sons at home. Do you have to deal with sick kids? Do you have to arrange an emergency babysitter so you can get to class on time? Do you have to fight traffic to get here after working a full day? You would be much more understanding if you weren’t just a kid with no responsibility other than going to classes.â€
Answer Part II – Once you have written your response, answer the following questions:
Did you find it hard to provide empathetic responses? Why or why not?
What step was the most difficult?
When would you most likely use the skill of empathy?
Can one make a mistake when using empathy?
Source: A. Johnson & A. Kinicki, Group and Video Resource Manual: An Instructor’s Guide to an Active Classroom (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2006), pp. 155-157.
1H. Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird (Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1960).
2Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary, n.d., http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary.(Accessed July 1, 2015).
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:37:462021-08-01 04:37:46empathy the misunderstood skill
other authors have Marina Abramovic, Koblenz, Frank Gehry, Doris Salcedo
A 750 word reflection piece that is worth 20% of the final grade. The requirements of this reflection piece are:
a) You are asked to comment and elaborate on the following statement by Miles Davis in Miles Davis. The Birth of Cool (Netflix 2019): “If anybody wants to keep creating they have to be about change.â€
b) Reflect on what creativity is based on Miles Davis’ statement plus three other authors we have studied during the course.
c) Define what creativity is, followed by how it applies to your selected authors, giving specific examples of either creative moments or works by those authors. Wrap it all up around David’s comment, jazz, and music in the 20th Century.
d) Date: to be handed in via owl before March 30 at 11:55pm. The assignment will be open tonight for those who want to submit and finish the course early.
e) If you use documents to support your piece, please properly refer to them in your bibliography. For you quotes and bibliography, use the most recent version of the APA citation system (https://www.lib.uwo.ca/files/styleguides/APA.pdf).
f) Rubric:
-Clarity of your piece (30%).
-Use of course materials (30%).
-Elaboration on Miles Davis’ statement (20%).
-Connectedness and/or separation between jazz/music and other forms of creation studied during the course (20%).
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:31:292021-08-01 04:31:29refelection and creativity 1
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old.
Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.
Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change.
A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:
Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals.
1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:
background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)
2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A.
4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.
5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices.
B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:
Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A.
1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:
background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
methodology (e.g., research type and sampling methods)
2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B.
4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study.
5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices.
C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness to reduce stress and burnout among intern medical practitioners. (2017)
Original Article: Reducing nurses’ stress: A randomized controlled trial of a web-based stress management program for nurses (2016)
Reduced mental workload of neonatal intensive care unit nurses through a self-designed education class: A randomized controlled trial. (2019)
“A stressful and frightening experienceâ€? Children’s nurses’ perceived readiness to care for children with cancer following pre-registration nurse education: A qualitative study (2017)
Fatigue in hospital nurses — ‘Supernurse’ culture is a barrier to addressing problems: A qualitative interview study (2017)
The consequences of violence against nurses working in the emergency department: A qualitative study (2018)
Psychosocial care from the perspective of nurses working in oncology: A qualitative study (2018)
A qualitative study investigating training requirements of nurses working with people with dementia in nursing homes (2017)
Please use the information below to select and verify articles for task 1.
Quantitative Primary Research
-Research has a methods section that describes how data was collected (choose an article that states “randomized controlled†trial or study in the methods section)
-Uses observations or survey/questionnaire to collect data
-Results are numbers
-No mention of mixed methods, quality improvement project or pilot or protocol or feasibility or cost benefit analyses
-Primary research because the researcher collected the data used in the article directly (information can not be from another source like hospital records, databases, insurance claims, past publications, information collected in the past, or information that was not solely collected for the purpose of the research)
Qualitative Primary Research
-Research has a methods section that describes how data was collected
-Primarily uses interviews and/or focus groups only to collect data (talking)
-Results are words and themes from the talking collected
– No mention of mixed methods, quality improvement project or pilot or protocol or feasibility or cost benefit analyses
-Primary research because the researchers conducted the interviews and/or focus group
Rubric
A1 : A1. Quantitative: Article Areas
Not Evident
An article is not provided.
Approaching Competence
Does not identify a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The description does not address all of the given points, or the description of any point is not supported by the article.
Competent
Identifies a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the article by doing the following: The description addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description of each point is supported by the article.
A2:Quantitative: Critique of Evidence
Not Evident
An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each area of the journal article from part A1.
Approaching Competence
The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of the journal article from part A1 does not logically show whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
Competent
The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of the journal article from part A1 logically shows whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
A3:Quantitative: Protection and Considerations
Not Evident
An explanation of how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher is not provided.
Approaching Competence
The explanation does not use specific information from the journal article from part A to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.
Competent
The explanation uses specific information from the journal article from part A to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.
A4:Quantitative: Strength and Limitation
Not Evident
A submission is not provided, or the submission does not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study.
Approaching Competence
The submission is missing relevant information about the 1 identified strength or the 1 identified limitation of the study.
Competent
The submission provides relevant information about the 1 identified strength and the 1 identified limitation of the study.
A5:Quantitative: Evidence Application
Not Evident
A submission is not provided.
Approaching Competence
The submission does not describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. Or the description is not supported with specific examples of currently used nursing practices.
Competent
The submission accurately describes how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. The description is supported with specific examples of currently used nursing practices.
B1:Qualitative: Article Areas
Not Evident
An article is not provided.
Approaching Competence
Does not identify a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The description does not address all of the given points, or the description of any point is not supported by the article.
Competent
Identifies a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the article by doing the following: The description addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description of each point is supported by the article.
B2:Qualitative: Critique of Evidence
Not Evident
An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each area of the journal article from part B1.
Approaching Competence
The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of the journal article from part B1 does not logically show whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
Competent
The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of the journal article from part B1 logically shows whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.
B3:Qualitative: Protection and Considerations
Not Evident
An explanation of how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher is not provided.
Approaching Competence
The explanation does not use specific information from the journal article from part B to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.
Competent
The explanation uses specific information from the journal article from part B to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.
B4:Qualitative: Strength and Limitation
Not Evident
A submission is not provided, or the submission does not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study.
Approaching Competence
The submission is missing relevant information about the 1 identified strength or the 1 identified limitation of the study.
Competent
The submission provides relevant information about the 1 identified strength and the 1 identified limitation of the study.
B5:Qualitative: Evidence Application
Not Evident
A submission is not provided.
Approaching Competence
The submission does not describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. Or the description is not supported with specific examples of currently used nursing practices.
Competent
The submission describes how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. The description is supported with specific examples of currently used nursing practices.
The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
Approaching Competence
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.
Competent
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
Approaching Competence
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
Competent
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
https://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.png00adminhttps://coursesolver.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/csesolpxel-300x52.pngadmin2021-08-01 04:27:412021-08-01 04:27:41evidenced based practice 4
