Physiology Foundation
Physiology Foundation
Physiology Foundation: Please READ and REVIEW the DETAILS of the ENTIRE assignment. The assignment must be written professionally, scholarly, paraphrased, cited and with completed reference(s), and MUST include every detail the assignment asks to be completed.
**Attached is the…”The “W6 Rubric”…DBA – 885 – Prospectus Submission – Methodologist/Professor Comments”…”DBA – 885 – W4 – Prospectus Revision 1″…PLEASE RESEARCH THE DOCUMENTS…THEY PROVIDE THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO COMPLETE THIS ASSIGNMENT CORRECTLY AND PROPERLY…If anything else is needed, please let me know…
**Please do not rush on the assignment…THERE IS plenty of time to Research, and properly complete the assignment***Please do not repeat the same wording just to meet the word count***
**Please let me know your Fee, once you review the details of the assignment – For this Assignment please just update the Slides the Professors provided comments…and if you see anything else that may need to be updated/completed
Assignment Due Date: Sunday, August 28, 2022
Assignment Description
A key disposition of doctoral learners is that they value critical thinking and feedback, possessing an openness to new ideas, ready to challenge assumptions and consider other viewpoints. In this assignment, you will use the feedback from your chair (and methodologist, if applicable) as garnered in your earlier virtual conference call to revise your research prospectus for your chair to review and score.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- Locate the most current version of the prospectus PowerPoint template. Be sure to choose the version that aligns with your proposed study methodology (qualitative or quantitative).
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Consider the feedback on your prospectus PowerPoint given to you by your chair (and methodologist, if applicable).
Submit a revised draft of your prospectus PowerPoint that integrates the feedback from your chair (and methodologist, if applicable). Be sure to use the most current version of the prospectus PowerPoint template as well as the version that aligns with your proposed study methodology (qualitative or quantitative). Before submitting, you should self-evaluate your work using the Prospectus PowerPoint Scoring Slides located in the DC Network. A link to the scoring slides is available in the Class Resources for this course.
Rubric Criteria
Physiology Foundation
Collapse All Rubric Criteria
Background to the Problem
17.7 points
Criteria Description
Literature Review: Background to the Problem
4. 3: Meets Expectations
17.7 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
15.4 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
12.39 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Problem Space
23.6 points
Criteria Description
Literature Review: Problem Space
4. 3: Meets Expectations
23.6 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
20.53 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
16.52 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Theoretical Foundation
17.7 points
Criteria Description
Literature Review: Theoretical Foundation
4. 3: Meets Expectations
17.7 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
15.4 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
12.39 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Themes
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Literature Review: Themes
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Problem Statement
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Problem Statement
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Phenomena or Variables
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Phenomena (Qualitative) or Variables (Quantitative)
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Research Questions or Research Questions and Hypotheses
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Research Questions (Qualitative) or Research Questions and Hypotheses (Quantitative)
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present Physiology Foundation
Methodology Justification
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Methodology Justification
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Research Design
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Research Design
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Purpose Statement
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Purpose Statement
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
Physiology Foundation
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Population, Target Population, and Sample
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Population, Target Population, and Sample: Physiology Foundation
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Instrumentation and Data Sources
20.65 points
Criteria Description
Instrumentation and Data Sources
4. 3: Meets Expectations
20.65 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
17.97 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
14.45 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Data Collection
20.65 points Physiology Foundation
Criteria Description
Data Collection
4. 3: Meets Expectations
20.65 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
17.97 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
14.45 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Data Analysis Procedures
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Data Analysis Procedures
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Feasibility
17.7 points
Criteria Description
Feasibility
4. 3: Meets Expectations
17.7 points
Component is addressed clearly and comprehensively. No gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
15.4 points
Component is present and adequate. Small gaps are present that leave the reader with questions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
12.39 points
Not all components are present. Large gaps are present in the components that leave the reader with significant questions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Item is not present
Integration of Instructor Feedback
29.5 points
Criteria Description
Integration of Instructor Feedback
4. 3: Meets Expectations
29.5 points
Integration of instructor feedback is evident and meaningful. It is seamlessly incorporated into the flow of the paper. All instructor comments and suggestions are addressed.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
25.67 points
Integration of instructor feedback is vaguely attempted, but does not address the majority of instructor comments and suggestions.
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
20.65 points
Integration of instructor feedback is vaguely attempted, but does not address the majority of instructor comments and suggestions.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Integration of instructor feedback is either missing or not evident to the reader.
Overall Presentation
14.75 points
Criteria Description
Overall Presentation (Slides, writing, and APA)
4. 3: Meets Expectations
14.75 points
Presentation is concise and professional in appearance. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. APA citations and/or reference slide are included, and are correctly placed, accurate, and correctly formatted.
3. 2: Approaches Meeting Expectations
12.83 points
Presentation is concise but not entirely professional in appearance. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. APA citations and/or reference slide are included, and most are correctly formatted.
Physiology Foundation
2. 1: Does not meet Expectations
10.33 points
Presentation is not concise and professional in appearance. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. APA citations and/or reference slide are included but are misplaced, inaccurate, or incorrectly formatted.
1. 0: Not Present
0 points
Presentation is not concise and professional in appearance. Mechanical errors in presentation are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. APA citations and/or reference slide are not included.
Total295 points
