IT 315 Case Diagram Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Programming is often described as both an art and a science. Given that even the…

IT 315 Case Diagram Discussion Guidelines and Rubric Overview: Programming is often described as both an art and a science. Given that even the simplest programming task can yield many possibly solutions, one of the most powerful ways of learning the art of programming is to see other programmers’ solutions. These discussions offer you the opportunity to explain your process, reflect on the experience, ask questions for clarification, and gain insight from your classmates’ responses and instructor’s guidance. Prompt: Your initial post should include an embedded case diagram, an explanation of your process, and a reflection of what was learned in the activity. If you are unable to successfully complete the assignment by the initial deadline, you should post what you have achieved and an explanation of the process you have gone through to try and solve any problems you are encountering. This is an opportunity to reach out to your course community. You can resubmitted a corrected version in order to meet proficient criteria. If you make any changes to your assignment, Reply to your own initial post with any updates. Requirements for Case Diagram Discussion Board Assignments (Modules Two, Three, Five, and Seven) Students are required to post one initial post and to follow up with at least two response posts for each discussion board assignment. For your initial post (1), you must do the following: For your response posts (2), you must do the following:  Complete the activity (e.g., case diagram, explanation, etc.)  In Modules Two, Three, Five, and Seven, complete the initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Embed the appropriate case diagram.  Explain the steps you took to complete the activity.  Reflect on your experience and what you learned.  Comment on the posts of at least two different classmates outside of your own initial post thread.  In Modules Two, Three, Five, and Seven, complete the two response posts by Sunday 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.  Demonstrate more depth and thought than simply stating something like “Well done,” or “I took a different approach.” Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Rubric Critical Elements Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Value Comprehension Initial post provides a case diagram and an organized, clear explanation of the process/steps involved, demonstrating mastery of the activity (100%) Initial post provides a case diagram and an adequate explanation of the process/steps involved, demonstrating successful completion of the activity or Additional attempts are included as replies to the initial post that demonstrate successful completion of the activity (85%) Initial post provides a case diagram and an incomplete explanation of the process/steps taken to attempt to complete the activity, or no further attempt(s) were made to successfully complete assignment (55%) Does not provide a screenshot and/or the explanation of the process/steps taken to attempt the activity is incomplete (0%) 25 Explanation Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation shows keen insight into the design methodology of the software system (100%) Explains the approach taken to creating the model and provides specific detail justifying all design decisions (85%) Explains the approach taken to creating the model, but explanation contains inaccuracies or fails to include specific detail justifying all design decisions (55%) Does not explain the approach taken to create the model (0%) 15 Reflection Initial post includes an in-depth reflection on what was learned from completing the activity (100%) Initial post includes a basic reflection on what was learned (85%) Initial post includes superficial reflection on what was learned from completing the activity (55%) Initial post does not include a reflection on what was learned from completing the activity (0%) 15 Verification and Validation Meets “Proficient” criteria and verification and validation process is particularly detailed and well-documented (100%) Verifies that the model is correct, complete, and valid given the structural model and functional model of the SIS system (85%) Verification and validation of model contains inaccuracies or omits key details with respect to the structural model and functional model of the SIS system (55%) Does not verify that the model is correct, complete, and valid against the structural model and the functional model of the SIS system (0%) 15 Timeliness Submits initial post on time (100%) Submits initial post one day late (55%) Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) 10 Engagement Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (85%) Provides somewhat relevant response posts with little explanation and detail (55%) Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail, or does not reply to peers (0%) 20 Total 100%

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"