Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

1 RUNNING HEAD: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND PROPOSAL This paper we review the analysis of fundamentals for the company Square and their competitor Pay..

Details:

Throughout this course, you have researched a wealth of data and analytics to construct a comprehensive financial analysis and proposal (excluding tables, figures, and addenda) of a chosen company following the nine-step assessment process detailed in Assessing a Company’s Future Financial Health.

There are three parts to the final component assignment of the Benchmark – Financial Analysis and Proposal.

Part One

Apply the final two steps of the nine-step assessment process detailed in Assessing A Company’s Future Financial Health (i.e., Step 8: Stress Testing and Step 9: Financing and Operating Plan for Current Year) to compose further assessment of the company/competitor pairing analysis as below:

  1. Perform stress testing under scenarios of likely adversity and value your firm using appropriate valuation techniques on the pro forma financial data analysis you constructed earlier in the course.
  2. Compare your results from step #1 against the current stock price of your chosen company and competitor. Construct an argument in favor of investing in either the chosen company, or the competitor, with sufficient supportive detail and/or data to make your case.

Part Two

Access the three prior component assignments, with instructor feedback incorporated, that you submitted in Topics 2, 4, and 6. Integrate these three assignments into the final Benchmark – Financial Analysis and Proposal submission along with the Component 4 assignment in this topic (Part One) to provide a comprehensive analysis inclusive of all nine steps that flows from start to finish. Note: You may need to re-write certain sections or statements in order to provide a cohesive flow to your submission. Assume this is a real-world proposal you will be presenting and revise or “polish” your work accordingly.

Part Three

Develop a 250-word “introduction” to your analysis and proposal that can serve as an overview in the event that you do present this to a single or group of potential investors. Consider factors that might impede an individual’s ability to focus on the information, and present only key and other potentially relevant points this individual or group needs to know.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Apply Rubrics

Benchmark – Financial Analysis and Proposal Component 4 and Final Submission

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
40.0 %Incorporation of the Required Set of Assessment Elements and Subsection Data. The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is not present. The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is present, and is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. The required set of assessment elements and subsection data is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
10.0 %Integration of Prior Financial Analysis and Proposal Components with Incorporation of Feedback Integration of prior financial analysis and proposal components with incorporation of feedback is not present. Integration of prior financial analysis and proposal components with incorporation of feedback is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. Integration of prior financial analysis and proposal components with incorporation of feedback is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. Integration of prior financial analysis and proposal components with incorporation of feedback is present in full. The submission encompasses adequate details level of support. Integration of prior financial analysis and proposal components with incorporation of feedback is present and comprehensive. The submission encompasses essential details. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Financial Analysis and Proposal Introduction for Senior Management The financial analysis and proposal analysis introduction for senior management is not present. The financial analysis and proposal analysis introduction for senior management is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. The financial analysis and proposal analysis introduction for senior management is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. The financial analysis and proposal analysis introduction for senior management is present, and is incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. The financial analysis and proposal analysis introduction for senior management is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.
20.0 %Organization & Effectiveness  
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage  
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"